It’s a cliché to say this, but in the U.S., Romanian wine is as mysterious as a Transylvanian castle. In fact, Transylvania is one of the three major wine-growing areas of Romania, I learned this summer when some of that country’s major wine producers paid a visit to New York City.

Transylvania is one of seven official demarcated wine regions in Romania. The Transylvanian plateau (in the middle of the country) produces mainly white wines, as does the whole northeast of Romania. The area to the east, along the Moldovan border, has a more temperate climate and produces some white, but more red wines. And the south, closer to the Danube River (which empties into the Black Sea) is a bit warmer still, with more red wine production.

The sunniest corner in Romania’s southwest is the location of one of the wineries represented in New York, Domenuil Coroanei Segarcea, the “Domaine of the Crown” which was part of the territory allotted to the first king of united Romania in 1884. The king used his lands—both here and in other regions—to generate revenue for the crown and for the country, by growing crops like grapes, grains, and timber. So the concept of commercial winemaking is not a new one to Romanians. This was a surprise to me, as I had envisioned a tradition of small, family-owned vineyards in this remote country, not the well-established wine industry that has existed for well over a hundred years.

However, during the Soviet era wine quality inevitably suffered. The first people to put money into the post-Soviet wine industry prioritized pricing and quantity, which resulted in a further blow to the reputation and quality of Romania’s wines. Now, several wineries are trying to challenge that standing. At the moment it’s a difficult, uphill climb but there are glimpses of success in the landscape. Growing and production parameters have been put in place, and winemakers operate under E.U. certifications for their wines of protected designation of origin (PDO) and protected geographical indication (PGI). Today, Romania is the seventh largest grape growing and wine-producing country in the European Union. Due to high local consumption, only three percent of Romania’s wines are exported.

Anghel family, owners of the Domeniul Coroanei winery

The U.S. gets about seven percent of Romania’s wine exports and Romanian producers are looking to dramatically increase this number. Among those I would recommend (from my tasting of several dozen wines) are the higher end wines from the Domeniul Coroanei and Senator wineries. Many of the whites and reds from Cramele Recas, Carl Reh, and Murfatlar wineries I found less consistently appealing to my Western-trained palate. The Romanians’ best red wines often came from their leading indigenous red grape: feteasca neagra, which makes medium- to light-bodied red wines with moderate tannins, nice acidity, and aromas and flavors that can include earthy or spicy notes. In some wines, this grape was nicely blended with cabernet sauvignon and/or merlot. Other typical native grapes in Romanian wines include the red babeasca neagra and the white feteasca alba, feteasca regala and tamaioasa romaneasca. The best white wines I tasted were made from the international varieties sauvignon blanc and pinot gris; there is also some chardonnay in Romania, which was less successful, at this tasting.

The five wineries mentioned above have banded together to launch a marketing initiative to bring Romanian wine to the rest of the world’s consciousness. From what I saw, they are as professional as they are ambitious. If their confidence can be translated into consistent wine quality increases, over the coming decade they should be able to create an identity for themselves—hopefully, starring Romania’s indigenous grapes in wines that appeal to the Western world they are now a part of.

[author] [author_image timthumb=’on’][/author_image] [author_info]Becky Sue Epstein is Palate Press’s International Editor. An experienced writer, editor, broadcaster, and consultant in the fields of wine, spirits, food, and travel, her work appears in many national publications including Art & Antiques, Luxury Golf & Travel, Food + Wine, and Wine Spectator. She began her career as a restaurant reviewer for the Los Angeles Times while working in film and television.[/author_info] [/author]

About The Author

Becky Sue Epstein
International Editor

Becky Sue Epstein is Palate Press’s International Editor. An experienced writer, editor, broadcaster, and consultant in the fields of wine, spirits, food, and travel, her work appears in many national publications including Art & Antiques, Luxury Golf & Travel, Food + Wine, and Wine Spectator. She began her career as a restaurant reviewer for the Los Angeles Times while working in film and television.

Related Posts

11 Responses

  1. Remus

    Another wine that I have recently tried while on a trip to Romania and was a pleasant surprise was the Stirbey’s Winery white Cramposie Selectionata …

  2. S.M.

    Hello Ms. Epstein

    Another great article from you. I always enjoy reading your articles as you seem to enjoy venturing off the beaten track and exploring emerging and/or new/old regions such as Georgia, etc.

    An interesting historical footnote is that for many years Transylvania was part of Hungary, so the people there benefited from the hundreds of years of experience and knowledge of great wine regions such as Eger, Tokaj, Villany, the Balaton Lake wine regions, etc.

    I do hope that some day I will get to try to some Romanian wine and find out for myself what it’s like.


    Solomon Mengeu

    • Daniel

      Really now… in whine making I really don’t think that we had anything to learn from hungarians but the opposite. Hungarians are basically a branch of Mongolians and they are not renowed for their taste in wine. You know is hard to know about wine when you are a nomadic pileager. The winemaking in these parts started in the times of Dacians and ancient Greece, so somewat in at we call antiquity. So is very less likely we learned to make wines from mongolians or gothic tribes who at those times they were depicted as uncivilised barbarians. You folks should get the facts right. The wine started in ancient times by ancients, not by noobs like goths, gauls or celts who were prety much barbarians at the time.

    • Zalmoxis

      I doubt you know the real historical progression of when Huns invaded Europe and when they settled in as an ethnicity called the Hungarian people. That happened late in South-European history though, while Dacians, Thracians and Greeks were there already producing wine, so no need to “be influenced” by late invaders. So let’s get real, Hungarian invaders originate from Mongolia, and led by Attila they invaded Europe, mixed with locals and settled down in what we have today as Hungary. Besides, there is no historical proof shown by ancient Greeks to provide empirical testimony that Hungarians ever existed in Dacia before local people were already producing wine. Ancient Greeks attested the existence of Dacians – nowadays Romanians – that were already cultivating imported Greek and local vines and brewed wine especially red one. Why would you contradict ancient Greek history? It has already been written, few thousand years ago.

  3. Daniel

    Hey there. I am amazed you call us “that” country and you say the wine industry is somewhat of a little more than a century old. I like your article and really appreciate you comment about Romanian wines. But with all that, without pumping things up, I must tell you we are not a “that”country we are most likely the country or geographically c place where wine was made long before France or the Gauls even existed, or the Roman Empire for that matter. Wine in these lands is as old as history, not somewhat of 100 years old. So, yes there is room to improve but mainly in branding and marketing cause for quality, Romanian and Moldovan wines are just as good if not better than French or Italian, any day. And this is not bragging, I invite you to taste some and read some more
    about us maybe. Check that we ae not a “that”country country, with some 100and years of winemaking in it’s back :).

  4. Zalmoxis

    Romanian vineyards and wines are historically recognised by ancient Greeks from Miletus that traded wine 3500 years ago via this “remote” country (as you like to put it). Romania always had close ties with Greece in wine trading and producing. Therefore, at least in wine making, we can proudly say that we are older than France as a country. When Romans enlarged their empire and decided to move on, they discovered Dacia and established there trade posts and military logistics, especially for buying wine for their soldiers. I honestly appreciate you for your information provided in this article but, hey, don’t forget that we are part of the older part of the Old World, a point where culture was passed towards the entire Europe. And that occurred few millennia before even the US happened to become a country. Let’s respect the history of this world, or else we’ll go back to stone age. Cheers!

  5. Zalmoxis

    Dacia (nowadays Romania) have been described by ancient Greeks some 3000 years ago as a wine producing country. Later – some 2000 years ago – the Romans conquered Dacia and found loads of (guess what) vineyards and wine to satisfy their soldiers’ thirst. It is all attested in written ancient Greek or engraved in the capital of Italy, Rome at the Roman Forum, Trajan’s Column. Now, I guess that is more than “One hundred years in the making” as you used to state in the title. Good article though, keep it on. Cheers!