Astringency In 1,024 Words Erika Szymanski June 24, 2012 Columns, Erika Szymanski, Features, Latest News 10 Comments It’s a flavor! It’s a feeling! It’s an airplane! No, it’s astringency! On the surface, astringency seems like pornography. It’s easy to recognize, even if it’s difficult to define. The problem is that it isn’t really all that easy to recognize. In wine, astringency is easily and often confused with bitterness and even sour sensations. Astringency is also a bit complicated, so it’s not discussed much outside of technical circles. So what is it, and why should you care? Here’s astringency, in 1024 words. Astringency is a mouth feeling, not a flavor. Flavors are sweet, sour, salty, bitter, umami, and permutations thereupon. Flavors are registered by specialized receptors clustered in taste buds on the tongue, soft palate, and epiglottis (the flap that prevents food from going down your windpipe when you swallow), mostly. We call the resulting sensations “taste.” Mouth-feels are tactile sensations: temperature, viscosity, touch, burning, pain, prickling, and astringency. Mouth-feels are registered by mechanoreceptors specialized for touch, thermoreceptors specialized for temperature, nociceptors specialized for pain, and proprioreceptors specialized for movement and position scattered all over the mouth. And the closest we can come to a generalized word for the resulting sensations is mouth-feel, though that’s not entirely accurate. Part of our problem with feelings like astringency, then, is that we’re just not all that attuned to paying attention to and naming sensations in our mouth that aren’t flavor or temperature. Wine’s astringency and bitterness both come principally from polyphenols—tannin—that is why red wine tends to be far more astringent than most white wine. Grape tannin is derived almost entirely from grape seeds, stems, and skin. Since red wines are made by fermenting juice in contact with skins (and some seeds, and sometimes some stems) while the juice for white wines is separated from the skins before fermentation, and since tannins are more soluble in alcoholic solutions than in plain aqueous solutions, red wines pick up much more tannin than whites. Reds are also much more likely to be aged in oak barrels than are white wines. Since oak (and many other types of wood) also contains tannin, that barrel time is another opportunity for wine to pick up additional astringency. Grape tannins come from seeds, skins, and stems. Image: Agne27 at the English language Wikipedia Tannin dissolved in water feels “dry” or “rough;” some people refer to a furry or sticky feeling on the roof of their mouths. The biochemistry here is that tannins bind to proteins in saliva—the proteins that create that nice slippery feeling—and cause them to form big agglomerates that fall out of solution, making your saliva less viscous and therefore making your mouth feel “dry.” If you’re not easily grossed out, try looking in a spittoon that has been used for spitting (not just dumping leftover) red wine; the long, red, stringy floating things you’ll see are salivary proteins that have bound to (red-colored) tannins and fallen out of solution. Tannins also interact with and disrupt the surface of the mucosal epithelial cells that line the interior of your mouth, physically making those membranes rougher. It seems that they might mimic the effect of epinephrine, a hormone that constricts blood vessels, reducing blood flow to those mucosal membranes and, again, making your mouth feel dry. (There are likely other things going on here that also contribute to rough and dry sensations, but these are the most important ones.)some Condensed tannins like the ones found in grapes are complex chains of polyphenols such as catechin and epicatechin. Up to this point, knowing about astringency just seems like good wine-tasting trivia: “hey, do you know why that Cabernet Sauvignon makes your mouth feel sandpapery?” But there are two useful points at the bottom of all of this. Firstly, because of its effects on salivary proteins, astringency can take several seconds to develop and the sensation builds up over repeat exposure. If you taste the same tannin solution three times, it will feel most astringent on the last sip even though it’s the same solution every time. If you taste several red wines in a row, especially without waiting in-between or “washing” your mouth with some food or water, the cumulative effect of tannins on the inside of your mouth will make the last wine feel more astringent than it would had you tasted it first or by itself. Point the first: be careful of “sequence errors” in tasting. If the last wines on your tasting list taste unpleasantly rough—and especially if you haven’t taken some water and/or food and/or time in between tastes—don’t automatically blame the wine. Consider coming back to try those wines at the beginning of another session…or, better yet, pace yourself from the get-go. Point the second: some foods are astringent, and these foods tend to be tricky wine pairings at least in part because red wine can taste more astringent in their company. Prime examples are artichokes, cardoons (related to artichokes), walnuts, and green beans. Under-ripe persimmons are super-astringent—if you’ve ever bitten into one, you know what I mean—but if you’re using those in a recipe, you have bigger problems than the wine pairing. Chocolate is another relatively rich source of tannins, one of several reasons why it’s a tough wine pairing at best (more details on that topic here.) Astringency is only one consideration in pleasant food-wine pairing, but it’s an important one. There’s plenty of advice on the internet about pairing astringent wine with food, some conflicting. Of course, the most useful evidence on what to serve with astringent wines comes from playing around in your kitchen to see what tastes good to you. The second most useful evidence I’ve seen thus far comes from a 2012 study by a group of Italian food scientists published in the Journal of Food Science measuring how much salivary protein wine tannins could precipitate under varying conditions. They found that the tannins were able to bind less salivary protein when the alcohol level of the wine was higher, in the presence of sugar, and at less acidic pH. These data jive with common advice that sweetness helps lessen the perception of astringency and sourness exacerbates it (but it’s nice to have some numbers behind those aphorisms.) It’s also worth noting that there’s logic to the custom of serving astringent wines with protein- and fat-rich foods. Food protein will bind to some of those protein-binding tannins and, essentially, help soak them up so that they wreak less havoc on your saliva and mucosal membranes. Fat, on the other hand, just makes your mouth feel more slippery and alleviates some of that tannin-related roughness. And, if nothing else, you can sound erudite saying, “this wine is very astringent” instead of “gosh, this wine is really dry.” But you already know how I feel about the word “dry”… [author] [author_image timthumb='on']http://palatepress.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/yoga-headshot-2010-thumb.jpg[/author_image] [author_info]Erika Szymanski was blessed with parents who taught her that wine was part of a good meal, who believed that well-behaved children belonged in tasting rooms with their parents, and who had way too many books. Averting a mid-life crisis in advance, she recently returned to her native Pacific Northwest to study for a PhD in microbial enology at Washington State University. Her goal, apart from someday having goats, is melding a winery job to research on how to improve the success rate of spontaneous ferments. When tending her Brettanomyces leaves enough time, her blog Wine-o-scope keeps notes on why being a wine geek is fun.[/author_info] [/author] Pingback: Astringency In 1024 Words – Palate Pres - My Wine Broker http://www.tastingpanelmag.com Deborah Parker Wong Describing astringency to consumer wine enthusiasts is always tricky, thanks for helping clarify the subject by sorting mouth feeling from flavor. The physical discussion will come in handy when defending those of us who judge wine competitions. We can now add sequence error to frame error as two scenarios that judges must be highly conscious of when evaluating wine. http://www.newvinesbb.com Todd Eichas Informative article, Erika. Would be interested to apply your knowledge of astringency to the winemaking process as far as proper amount of astringency in a red wine vs. too much or too little, along with the best means to adjust. Are you visiting the Finger Lakes this year? http://palatepress.com/2009/11/wine/what-wine-goes-with-red-herring/ SUAMW Todd: Harbertson-Adams tannin assay. Erika Szymanski Now, Arthur, that’s not fair. Jim’s work is uniformly great and definitely worth reading (and I’m not just saying that because he’s advised some of my friends’ graduate work), but it won’t tell a winemaker how much tannin any given wine should have. Means to adjust, yes. Proper amount of astringency, no. The latter is a very personal, taste-driven choice and will always be regardless of what we know about tannin polymerization and the like. Todd, thanks for the compliment. I’ll email you. http://www.tercerowines.com larry schaffer Thanks for the very informative article – and for trying to explain a ‘complex’ concept in simpler terms. Astringency is a term not often used by most wine consumers I interact with – yet they clearly understand the ‘effect’ of wines with astringency. I also appreciate you nod to the recent Italian study for it shows that it’s not just about the tannin level in a wine that matters but about a number of other factors as well. But there’s a couple of things that you did not mention that I think are important to. First, everyone’s mouths are different and therefore one person’s ‘very astringent’ may not be the same as another. This seems to have more to do with bitter aversion than anything else, but it is definitely something that is important to note when comparing different people. For instance, if someone is not bitter averse at all, they may taste a very tannic wine and still find it ‘smooth’ and not very astringent, whereas the person who is bitter averse will find a very different result. The second thing to note, and one that I am familiar with since I worked in Doug Adams’ lab at UC Davis with Jim before he took off for WSU, is that not all ‘tannins’ are alike. Polymeric pigments, for instance, those tannins that have bound themselves to anthocyanin (color) molecules, have a reduced affinity to bind to salivary proteins. Therefore, two wines with the same level of tannin but one have a higher amount of polymeric pigments will show noticeable differences in astringency . . . Just my $.02 this morning . . . Cheers! Erika Szymanski Absolutely, Larry. I’ve shied away from writing a general tannin piece just because tannin chemistry is so very, very complicated. This was my effort to deal with one small element of tannin-related flavor chemistry without trying to tackle the whole lot at once. Good points! Pingback: Amuse Bouche « Edible Arts http://www.cars.com cars All large purchases are always intimidating, especially if you are uninformed about the industry. One of the scariest purchases is buying cars. Many people fear they are getting ripped off and you surely don’t want that. Avoid buying a lemon by looking through these great tips and tricks regarding car purchases. Milton Stokes Do you have a citation for your definition of flavor? I ask because Brown (2011) defines it as “The combined sense of taste, odor, and mouthfeel.” Thank you.